
Last week we also had a most enjoyable visit to a year 1 classroom at Chisholm CPS. There I had an interesting conversation with one of the Year 1 students. I noticed that, here, as in other schools we had visited, all the children were generally very well trained to clear the memory of the Bee-Bot before adding a new set of commands. Occasionally, when this was not done of course the new instructions are added to those given previously. When tested Bertie then has a much longer program and doesn’t do what the users expect.
When I questioned one of the boys “What happens to Bertie when you forget to use the clear button?” He replied “He just goes wherever he wants!” This was an interesting observation, as I have had the same response to my question in several different early childhood classrooms in various schools. It suggests that the children still do not fully grasp the idea that the Bee-Bot only does as it is instructed or programmed to do. This confusion between living and non-living things is often found in young children’s relationships with their toys such as dolls and teddy bears. In our case, because the robot has an equivalence to a living thing in the real world (namely a bee) and because we have named him “Bertie” the children have formed strong emotional attachments to the “Bee-Bot” and attribute life-like characteristics to the bot, wrongly perceiving “he” can decide things for “himself”.
This blurring of the boundaries is developmental and will probably peacefully co-exist with the children’s ongoing learning experiences until they develop the understanding that they control the Bee-Bot. As another child said “Bertie has a very good memory. He can remember up to 40 steps. I read it on the box!”
